AGM-consistency and perfect Bayesian equilibrium. Part II: from PBE to sequential equilibrium
نویسنده
چکیده
In [6] a general notion of perfect Bayesian equilibrium (PBE) for extensive-form games was introduced and shown to be intermediate between subgame-perfect equilibrium and sequential equilibrium. Besides sequential rationality, the ingredients of the proposed notion are (1) the existence of a plausibility order on the set of histories that rationalizes the given assessment and (2) the notion of Bayesian consistency relative to the plausibility order. We show that a cardinal property of the plausibility order and a strengthening of the notion of Bayesian consistency provide necessary and su¢ cient conditions for a PBE to be a sequential equilibrium.
منابع مشابه
Exploring the Gap between Perfect Bayesian Equilibrium and Sequential Equilibrium
In (Bonanno, 2013), a solution concept for extensive-form games, called perfect Bayesian equilibrium (PBE), was introduced and shown to be a strict refinement of subgame-perfect equilibrium; it was also shown that, in turn, sequential equilibrium (SE) is a strict refinement of PBE. In (Bonanno, 2016), the notion of PBE was used to provide a characterization of SE in terms of a strengthening of ...
متن کاملAGM-consistency and perfect Bayesian equilibrium. Part I: definition and properties
We provide a general notion of perfect Bayesian equilibrium which can be applied to arbitrary extensive-form games and is intermediate between subgame-perfect equilibrium and sequential equilibrium. The essential ingredient of the proposed definition is the qualitative notion of AGM-consistency, which has an epistemic justification based on the theory of belief revision introduced by Alchourrón...
متن کاملOn the beliefs off the path: An experimental investigation of equilibrium refinement∗
We report the results of an experiment designed to shed light on beliefs off equilibrium paths. The experiment implements an incomplete information club game. A unique outcome results in all perfect Bayesian equilibria, but beliefs and actions off the equilibrium path are unconstrained under all concepts except extensive form rationalizability (EFR) and logit equilibrium. 90% of subject’s decis...
متن کاملRevelation Principles in Multistage Games∗
We study the revelation principle in multistage games for perfect Bayesian equilibium and sequential equilibrium. The question of whether or not the revelation principle holds is subtle, as expanding players’ opportunities for communication expands the set of consistent beliefs at off-path information sets. In settings with adverse selection but no moral hazard, Nash, perfect Bayesian, and sequ...
متن کاملSequential Information Design
The literature on implementation has focused mainly on cases in which agents have both agency over their actions and over the time at which they commit to their actions. We take as given the set of agents, their set of actions, and their payoffs. We ask what distributions over actions are consistent with the players playing according to some extensive form. The main result of the paper is to sh...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Int. J. Game Theory
دوره 45 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2016